Recently, the Supreme Court while revisiting the settled distinction between the seat and venue of arbitration reiterated that once the seat is designated by agreement of the parties, the Courts of that place alone have exclusive jurisdiction to entertain all proceedings arising out of the arbitration, including challenges to the award. The designation of the seat operates akin to an exclusive jurisdiction clause, excluding all other courts - even those where the cause of action may have arisen.
Brief Facts
The factual matrix of the case is that the Respondent was engaged by the Appellant for the execution of four infrastructure projects and the agreement between the parties was executed on 31.03.2008. Thereafter, the dispute arose between the parties and the Respondent invoked the arbitration. Subsequently, the Respondent filed an application under Section 11 of the Act before the High Court for appointment of sole arbitrator for each project and the arbitrator was appointed.
The arbitral tribunal with the consent of the parties fixed Srinagar as the seat of arbitration and New Delhi as the venue. The arbitral award was delivered at New Delhi. Thereafter, the Appellant filed a petition under Section 34 of the Act before the High Court seeking setting aside of the Arbitral Award, wherein the Respondent raised the preliminary objection regarding the territorial jurisdiction, and the Ld. High Court was pleased to return the Petition holding that since the arbitration proceedings were conducted and the award was rendered at New Delhi, the courts at New Delhi alone had jurisdiction. Aggrieved by this, the present appeal has been preferred by the Appellant.
Contentions
The counsel for the Appellant contended that the arbitrator had fixed the seat of arbitration at Srinagar, and the same could only be altered by mutual agreement. It was furthermore contended that where the seat and venue differ, the seat determines the supervisory jurisdiction.
On the other hand, the counsel for the Respondent contended that the arbitral award recorded New Delhi as the place of arbitration for all intents and purposes, and parties may alter seats by mutual consent. Therefore, the appeal is liable to be dismissed.
Issue before the Court
Whether, despite an express designation of Srinagar as seat of arbitration, the conduct of proceedings and rendering of the award at New Delhi would confer jurisdiction upon courts at New Delhi?
Observations of the Court
The Hon’ble Court revisited the settled distinction between the seat and venue of arbitration, and consequent determination of supervisory jurisdiction of the courts and laid down the following principles governing the distinction between the Seat and Venue of the arbitration, and the jurisdiction consequences which are as follows:
(i) The seat of arbitration constitutes the juridical home or legal place of arbitration. It determines the curial law governing the arbitral process and identifies the Court having supervisory control over the arbitration.
(ii) Once the seat is designated by agreement of the parties, the courts of that place alone have exclusive jurisdiction to entertain all proceedings arising out of the arbitration, including challenges to the award. The designation of the seat operates akin to an exclusive jurisdiction clause, excluding all other courts – even those where the cause of action may have arisen.
(iii) The venue is merely a geographical location chosen for convenience for holding hearings, examination of witnesses, or meetings of the arbitral tribunal. It does not confer jurisdiction and does not, by itself, alter or determine the seat. The arbitral tribunal is free to conduct proceedings at locations different from the seat without affecting the juridical seat.
(iv) The mere fact that arbitral proceedings are conducted or the award is rendered at a particular place does not confer jurisdiction on courts of that place if it is different from the designated seat. The seat remains fixed unless expressly altered by agreement of the parties.
(v) Where the seat is not expressly designated, courts determine it by applying:
(a) the closest and most intimate connection test, identifying the place most closely connected with the arbitration (based on the Naviera Amazonica principle); and
(b) in appropriate cases, construing the venue as the seat where the agreement and surrounding circumstances indicate such intention (as reflected in the Shashoua principle).
(vi) The intention of the parties, as discerned from the arbitration agreement and surrounding circumstances, is the paramount factor in determining the seat. Once such intention is expressed-either expressly or by necessary implication-it must be given full effect by Courts.
The Hon’ble Court observed that the parties expressly agreed upon the seat of arbitration at Srinagar and moreover, the contracts were executed between the parties in the State of Jammu & Kashmir and works were to be carried out within the said State. Furthermore, Justice Pamidighantam Sri Narasimha and Justice Alok Aradhe opined that the seat of arbitration is governed by the agreement of the parties and not by any stray recital in the award. Once the seat of arbitration is fixed, it remains immutable unless altered by an express agreement.
Holding that the mere fact that an arbitral tribunal for reasons of convenience, conducted proceedings at New Delhi or rendered the award at that place does not and cannot, alter the juridical seat of arbitration.
Decision of the Court
The Hon’ble Supreme Court allowed the appeal, holding that the Court at Srinagar being the court of seat of arbitration, alone possesses the jurisdiction to entertain and decide the challenge to the arbitral award.
Case Title: J&K Economic Reconstruction Agency Versus Rash Builders India Private Limited
Coram: Justice Pamidighantam Sri Narasimha and Justice Alok Aradhe
Case No.:CIVIL APPEAL No. OF 2026 (@ SLP (C) No. OF 2026) (@ DIARY No.44792 OF 2025)
Advocates for the Appellant: Adv. Pashupati Nath Razdan
Advocates for the Respondents: Adv. Mandakini Ghosh
Read Judgment @Latestlaws.com
Picture Source :
